SELEKSI SEKOLAH DASAR CALON PENERIMA BANTUAN PERPUSTAKAAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT

Main Article Content

Muhamad Muslihudin
Desti Tri Lestari
Siti Mukodimah
Sri Hartati

Abstract

Abstrak

Perpustakaan merupakan salah satu akses untuk mencari informasi,  terutama perpustakaan sekolah yang sangat penting bagi guru dan siswa untuk mencari sumber informasi dari bahan pustaka yang tersedia di perpustakaan sekolah. Produk utama perpustakaan adalah informasi. Perpustakaan sangatlah dibutuhkan bagi setiap sekolah dasar supaya dapat membantu penyelesaian masalah bagi siswa/i maupun dewan guru. Metode Weighted Product dapat membantu pengambilan keputusan dalam perangkingan sekolah dasar calon penerima bantuan perpustakaan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan cara mencari bobot setiap atribut, kemudian dilakukan proses perangkingan sekolah dasar yang akan menerima bantuan perpustakaan. Dalam penentuan perangkingan sekolah dasar calon penerima perpustakaan diperlukan kriteria-kriteria, yaitu : Jumlah Buku, Jumlah Judul Buku, Kondisi Buku, Frekwensi Layanan, Daya Minat Baca Siswa/i, Koleksi Perpustakaan. Hasil yang dicapai sistem pengambilan keputusan menghasilkan 7 alternatif rekomendasi sekolah dasar yang disarankan, dengan 3 nilai alternatif tertinggi yaitu: SDN 1 Sendang Agung, SDN 5 Sendang Mulyo, SDN 1 Sendang Mulyo.

 

Kata Kunci : Perpustakaan, SPK, Sekolah Dasar, Weighted Product, Bantuan

 

Abstract

The library is one of access to seek information, especially the school library which is very important for teachers and students to find the source of information from library materials available in the school library. The main product of the library is information. Libraries are urgently needed for every elementary school anywhere to help solve problems for students and teachers. The Weighted Product method can help decision making in primary school rankings of potential beneficiaries of library assistance. Research is done by finding the weight of each attribute, then done the primary school ranking process that will receive library assistance. In determining the ranking of primary school candidates the required criteria, that is: Number of Books, Number of Book Titles, Book Condition, Frequency of Service, Interest Reading of Students, Library Collection. The results of the decision making system resulted in 7 alternative recommended of primary school, with 3 highest alternative values that is: SDN 1 Sendang Agung, SDN 5 Sendang Mulyo, SDN 1 Sendang Mulyo.

 

Keywords : Library, Decision Making System, Primary School, Weighted Product Method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Article

References

[1] RI, “Undang-undang,” 2007.
[2] Y. Rio Novriliam, “PEMANFAATAN PERPUSTAKAAN SEKOLAH SEBAGAI PUSAT SUMBER BELAJAR DI SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 23 PAINAN UTARA,” J. Ilmu Inf. Perpust. dan Kearsipan, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 141–150, 2012.
[3] O. Amel Dhea Saputri, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN LOKASI PERUMAHAN DI KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU MENGGUNAKAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT,” J. KMSI, vol. 5, pp. 1–6, 2017.
[4] I. F. A. Septiyana Firdyana, Dedy Cahyadi, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product Untuk Menentukan Penerima Bantuan Beras Masyarakat Miskin ( RASKIN ),” Pros. Semin. ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017.
[5] W. U. Jaka Priatna, Gunawan Abdillah, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN BUKU UNTUK PERPUSTAKAAN DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG BARAT MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP DAN SAW,” SENTIKA 2016, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–7, 2016.
[6] D. Irawan and N. Mafrudhoh, “Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Pemberian Keputusan Pembebasan Biaya Bagi Siswa Yang Kurang Mampu Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Study Kasus Mi Hidayatuul Mubtadiin Srikaton Adiluwih),” vol. 7, pp. 27–37, 2016.
[7] E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, and T.-P. Liang, “Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems,” Decis. Support Syst. Intell. Syst., vol. 7, p. 867, 2007.
[8] S. Zulkifli, “Decision Support System Pemberian Bonus Tahunan Pada Karyawan Berdasarkan Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Study Kasus : Stmik Pringsewu ),” J. TAM ( Technol. Accept. Model ), vol. 7, pp. 67–73, 2016.
[9] N. T. Hartanti, K. Kusrini, and A. Amborowati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Program Keahlian di SMK Syubbanul Wathon Magelang,” Konf. Nas. Sist. Inform. 2015, pp. 9–10, 2015.
[10] Hilyah Magdalena, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN MAHASISWA LULUSAN TERBAIK DI PERGURUAN TINGGI (STUDI KASUS STMIK ATMA LUHUR PANGKALPINANG),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–8, 2012.
[11] S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and Retantyo Wardoyo, “Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM),” Ed. Pertama Cetakan Pertama. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta., 2006.
[12] A. M. Muhammad Muslihudin, Rita Irviani, Prayugo Khoir, “Decision Support System Level Economic Classification Of Citizens Using Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Makin,” in ICCSE, 2017, pp. 1–75.
[13] A. Andoyo, M. Muslihudin, and N. Y. Sari, “Pembuatan Model Penilaian Indeks Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making ( FMADM ) ( Studi : PTS di Provinsi Lampung ),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Darmajaya, 2017, pp. 195–205.
[14] R. Irviani, I. Dinulhaq, D. Irawan, R. Renaldo, and A. Maseleno, “Areas Prone of the Bad Nutrition based Multi Attribute Decision Making with Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting for Optimal Analysis,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 589–596, 2018.
[15] T. Susilowati, E. Y. Anggraeni, W. Andewi, Y. Handayani, and A. Maseleno, “Using Profile Matching Method to Employee Position Movement,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 415–423, 2018.
[16] M. Rizqi, A. Akbar, Y. Fitrian, and A. Maseleno, “Dismissal Working Relationship using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 177–184, 2018.
[17] T. Noviarti, M. Muslihudin, R. Irviani, and A. Maseleno, “Optimal Dengue Endemic Region Prediction using Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting based Algorithm,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 473–478, 2018.
[18] M. Muslihudin, T. S. Susanti, A. Maseleno, and S. Pringsewu, “The Priority of Rural Road Development using Fuzzy Logic based Simple Additive Weighting,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 9–16, 2018.
[19] M. Muslihudin, A. Latif, S. Ipnuwati, R. Wati, and A. Maseleno, “A Solution to Competency Test Expertise of Engineering Motorcycles using Simple Additive Weighting Approach,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 261–267, 2018.
[20] S. Mukodimah, M. Muslihudin, A. Andoyo, S. Hartati, and A. Maseleno, “Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting and its Application to Toddler Healthy Food,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1–7, 2018.
[21] W. Waziana, R. Irviani, I. Oktaviani, F. Satria, D. Kurniawan, and A. Maseleno, “Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting for Determination of Recipients Breeding Farm Program,” vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 93–100, 2018.
[22] A. Alinezhad, A. Amini, and A. Alinezhad, “Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives,” J. Ind. Eng., 2009.
[23] M. Muslihudin and F. Noviarti, Tri, “Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Perankingan Wilayah Endemik Demam Berdarah Di Kabupaten Tanggamus,” Semnasteknomedia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2018.
[24] U. Lestari and M. Targiono, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Klasifikasi Keluarga Miskin Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Sebagai Acuan Penerima Bantuan Dana Pemerintah (Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Desa Tamanmartani, Sleman),” J. TAM ( Technol. Accept. Model ), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 70–78, 2017.
[25] M. Muslihudin, D. Kurniawan, and I. Widyaningrum, “Implementasi Model Fuzzy SAW Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Penyuluh Agama,” J. TAM ( Technol. Accept. Model ), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2017.
[26] E. Y. Anggraeni, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Simple Additive Waighting ( FSAW ) Dalam Penentuan Perankingan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan ( SMK ) Di Kabupaten Pringsewu,” SEMNASTEKNOMEDIA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2017.
[27] L. Muhamad Muslihudin, “Implementasi Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Diagnosa Awal Gangguan Pada Masa Kehamilan,” in KNSI 2016, 2016, pp. 11–13.
[28] M. Muslihudin, F. Triananingsih, and L. Anggraei, “Pembuatan Model Penilaian Indeks Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting,” SEMNASTEKNOMEDIA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2017.
[29] S. H. Hanifa, Muhamad Muslihudin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Besar Gaji Untuk Guru Honorer Di Kabupaten Pesawaran Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy SAW,” Jurtek IST Akprind Yogyakarta, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2016.
[30] R. Suhandi, L. Anggraeni, and M. Muslihudin, “Cara Penentuan Kelayakan Calon Kepala Desa Pada Desa Blitarejo Mengunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” in KNSI 2016, 2016, pp. 11–13.
[31] K. A. Henry Wibowo, Riska Amalia, Andi Fadlun M, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Penerima Beasiswa Bank BRI Menggunakan FMADM (Studi Kasus: Mahasiswa Fakultas Teknologi Industri Universitas Islam Indonesia),” Semin. Nas. Apl. Teknol. Inf. 2009, no. Snati, pp. 1–6, 2009.
[32] M. Muslihudin, R. Fitri Andriyanti, S. Mukodimah, P. Sistem Informasi, and S. Pringsewu Lampung, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Menentukan Beasiswa Bidik Misi Stmik Pringsewu,” Jatisi, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.
[33] T. Ahamad Kumaidi, Umi Latifah, Rinawati, “Implementasi Weighted Product Pengklasifikasian Lahan Pertanian,” J. Ilmu Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2018.
[34] S. Mukodimah, M. Muslihudin, and A. Maseleno, “Implementasi Weighted Product Untuk Mengukur Indeks Kinerja Kepala Desa Di Kecamatan Pringsewu,” in KNSI 2018, 2018, pp. 587–592.
[35] D. M. K. Nency Nurjannah, Zainal Arifin, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SEPEDA MOTOR DENGAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT,” J. Inform. Mulawarman, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2015.